Thereafter, he was reinstated in service on 5.9.1991. Constitution of India - Article 226 –Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission Regulations, 1954 - Regulation 16(b) - writ of certiorarified mandamus filed - to direct the respondents to provide any suitable post to the petitioner on compassionate ground - petitioner could not survive without an employment gave an The petitioner is also stated to have sent several representations to the authorities requesting them to regularise the period of suspension between 15.11.1989 and 4.9.1991 as per Rule 54-B(3) and (4) of Fundamental Rules of Tamil Nadu Government. The petitioner prays for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the order of the second respondent in his letter dated 22.3.2001 and the order passed by the first respondent in G.O. * Husband is back to square 1 after loosing all the time and legal fees ! * HC says that the act of taking dowry is an act of moral turptitude and so this guy IS to be suspended !! Chemplast Sanmar Limited, Represented by its Executive Vice President (Legal), Chennai v/s The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, (TNEB), Chennai & Others. * there is NO need to wait for the appeals etc to run out (meaning husbands are at the mercy of the lowest courts !!) writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the entire records of the respondents leading to the detention of the father of the petitioner, namely P.Vijayakumar under Act 14 of 1982 as goonda vide detention order ! Tamil Nadu Power Producers Association and Another Vs. ... -petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india praying to issue writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records comprised in the impugned g.o.(ms. certiorarified mandamus to call for the records comprised in Award No.2/1999-2000 on the file of the Land Acquisition Officer (LA), Coke Oven Plant Project, Mettur/second respondent dated 30.6.1999, the true copy of which was served on the petitioners on 27.6.2007 by the t5h respondent and to quash the same as being null